Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 Small vs DeepSeek-R1

Comparing DeepSeek VL2 Small and DeepSeek-R1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 Small and DeepSeek-R1 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

655.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 655.0B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2 Small, making it 4093.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
16.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
16.0B
DeepSeek VL2 Small
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DeepSeek VL2 Small supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1 does not.

DeepSeek VL2 Small can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-R1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Small is licensed under deepseek, while DeepSeek-R1 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

deepseek

Open weights

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Small was released on 2024-12-13, while DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek-R1 is 1 month newer than DeepSeek VL2 Small.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

Dec 13, 2024

1.4 years ago

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Small vs DeepSeek-R1.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Small or DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek VL2 Small (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Small compare to DeepSeek-R1 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Small scores DocVQA: 92.3%, ChartQA: 84.5%, OCRBench: 83.4%, TextVQA: 83.4%, MMBench: 80.3%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 Small and DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek VL2 Small supports an unknown number of tokens and DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Small and DeepSeek-R1?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.