Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

DeepSeek VL2 Small outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 7 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, DocVQA, MMBench, MMMU, MMStar, OCRBench).

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

56.0B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 56.0B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2 Small, making it 350.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
16.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
16.0B
DeepSeek VL2 Small
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek VL2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Small is licensed under deepseek, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

deepseek

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Small was released on 2024-12-13, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 1 month newer than DeepSeek VL2 Small.

DeepSeek VL2 Small

Dec 13, 2024

1.3 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AI2D score (88.4% vs 80.0%)
Higher ChartQA score (89.5% vs 84.5%)
Higher DocVQA score (96.4% vs 92.3%)
Higher MMBench score (88.0% vs 80.3%)
Higher MMMU score (70.2% vs 48.0%)
Higher MMStar score (70.8% vs 57.0%)
Higher OCRBench score (88.5% vs 83.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek VL2 Small is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek VL2 Small scores DocVQA: 92.3%, ChartQA: 84.5%, OCRBench: 83.4%, TextVQA: 83.4%, MMBench: 80.3%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.
Key differences include licensing (deepseek vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek VL2 Small is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.