Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Comparing Gemini 3.1 Pro and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.1 Pro and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 14 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

1 months ago

1.2yr newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek.