Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs o3

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o3 is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o3
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and o3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while o3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

o3 is 4 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.3 years ago

o3

Apr 16, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

—

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher MathVista score (86.8% vs 53.6%)
Higher MMMU score (82.9% vs 40.7%)
DeepSeekDeepSeek VL2 Tiny
OpenAIo3
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
OpenAI
o3

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs o3

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is made by DeepSeek and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and o3 is developed by OpenAI.