Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 vs Claude 3 Sonnet

Comparing DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while DeepSeek VL2 is limited to 129,280 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Claude 3 Sonnet uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Claude 3 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29.

DeepSeek VL2 is 10 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.4 years ago

9mo newer
Claude 3 Sonnet

Feb 29, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. Claude 3 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

Claude 3 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Anthropic
Claude 3 Sonnet

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Claude 3 Sonnet.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Claude 3 Sonnet?

DeepSeek VL2 (DeepSeek) and Claude 3 Sonnet (Anthropic) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Claude 3 Sonnet in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Claude 3 Sonnet scores ARC-C: 93.2%, GSM8k: 92.3%, HellaSwag: 89.0%, MGSM: 83.5%, BIG-Bench Hard: 82.9%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Claude 3 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet?

Key differences include context window (129K vs 200K), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3 Sonnet?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Claude 3 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.