Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 vs LongCat-Flash-Lite

Comparing DeepSeek VL2 and LongCat-Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 and LongCat-Flash-Lite don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

41.5B diff

LongCat-Flash-Lite has 41.5B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 153.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
68.5Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
68.5B
LongCat-Flash-Lite

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

LongCat-Flash-Lite accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while LongCat-Flash-Lite is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input256,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Lite does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while LongCat-Flash-Lite uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

LongCat-Flash-Lite

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while LongCat-Flash-Lite was released on 2026-02-05.

LongCat-Flash-Lite is 14 months newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.3 years ago

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2026

2 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. LongCat-Flash-Lite is available from Meituan.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

LongCat-Flash-Lite

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs LongCat-Flash-Lite

DeepSeek VL2 (DeepSeek) and LongCat-Flash-Lite (Meituan) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. LongCat-Flash-Lite scores MATH-500: 96.8%, MMLU: 85.5%, CMMLU: 82.5%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, Tau2 Retail: 73.1%.
DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and LongCat-Flash-Lite supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (129K vs 256K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and LongCat-Flash-Lite is developed by Meituan.