Model Comparison

Devstral Medium vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 4.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Devstral Medium outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Devstral Medium ($0.40/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Devstral Medium ($2.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Devstral Medium is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerMistral
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Devstral Medium's 128,000 tokens. Devstral Medium can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Medium does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Devstral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Devstral Medium is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite uses Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Devstral Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Devstral Medium was released on 2025-07-10, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17.

Devstral Medium is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Devstral Medium

Jul 10, 2025

9 months ago

3w newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Devstral Medium's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Devstral Medium's cutoff date.

Devstral Medium

—

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Devstral Medium is available from Mistral AI. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Devstral Medium

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (61.6% vs 31.6%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Devstral Medium vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Devstral Medium is made by Mistral AI and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Devstral Medium scores SWE-Bench Verified: 61.6%. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Devstral Medium costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via mistral. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.
Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.