Model Comparison

Devstral Medium vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Comparing Devstral Medium and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Devstral Medium and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Devstral Medium costs less

For input processing, Devstral Medium ($0.40/1M tokens) is 50.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Devstral Medium ($2.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Devstral Medium.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerMistral
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Devstral Medium accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Devstral Medium can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Medium does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Devstral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Devstral Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Devstral Medium was released on 2025-07-10, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Devstral Medium is 0 month newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Devstral Medium

Jul 10, 2025

10 months ago

2w newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Devstral Medium's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Devstral Medium's cutoff date.

Devstral Medium

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Devstral Medium is available from Mistral AI. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Devstral Medium

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Devstral Medium vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Devstral Medium or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Devstral Medium (Mistral AI) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Devstral Medium compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Devstral Medium scores SWE-Bench Verified: 61.6%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Devstral Medium cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Devstral Medium is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Devstral Medium costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via mistral. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Devstral Medium and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Devstral Medium and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 32K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $20.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Devstral Medium and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.