Model Comparison

Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Comparing Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Devstral Small 1.1 is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Devstral Small 1.1's 128,000 tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Small 1.1 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Devstral Small 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Devstral Small 1.1 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Devstral Small 1.1

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-02-05.

Devstral Small 1.1 is 5 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

Devstral Small 1.1

Jul 11, 2025

10 months ago

5mo newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date.

Devstral Small 1.1

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Devstral Small 1.1

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Has open weights
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Devstral Small 1.1 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Devstral Small 1.1 (Mistral AI) and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Devstral Small 1.1 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Devstral Small 1.1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 53.6%. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores MATH: 86.8%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 78.2%, MMLU-Pro: 71.6%, MMMU: 68.0%.

Is Devstral Small 1.1 cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via mistral. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Devstral Small 1.1 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Devstral Small 1.1 is developed by Mistral AI and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.