Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Comparing Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Mistral AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Devstral Small 1.1 is roughly 10.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Devstral Small 1.1
- cost matters — it's about 10.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens).
For output processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Devstral Small 1.1's 128,000 tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Small 1.1 does not.
Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Devstral Small 1.1
Gemini 3.7 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Devstral Small 1.1 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.7 Flash uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11, while Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 13 months newer than Devstral Small 1.1.
Jul 11, 2025
1.1 years ago
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date.
—
Mar 2026
Provider Availability
Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI. Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google.
Devstral Small 1.1
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Devstral Small 1.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash.