Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 7.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Gemini 2.0 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 4.5 is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

ERNIE 4.5 is 7 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

9 months ago

6mo newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Higher GPQA score (74.0% vs 62.1%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 12.4%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (76.4% vs 16.0%)
BaiduERNIE 4.5
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output via novita. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.
ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google.