Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber — which is better?

ERNIE 4.5 (by Baidu) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is 13 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

6 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

ERNIE 4.5 (Baidu) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons