ERNIE 4.5 vs GLM-4.6 Comparison

Comparing ERNIE 4.5 and GLM-4.6 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-4.6 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

GLM-4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.6 costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than GLM-4.6 ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than GLM-4.6 ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-4.6.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

336.0B diff

GLM-4.6 has 336.0B more parameters than ERNIE 4.5, making it 1600.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6
357.0Bparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
357.0B
GLM-4.6

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-4.6 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. GLM-4.6 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

GLM-4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.6 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.6

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while GLM-4.6 was released on 2025-09-30.

GLM-4.6 is 3 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

8 months ago

GLM-4.6

Sep 30, 2025

5 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. GLM-4.6 is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

GLM-4.6

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (81.0% vs 74.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6