Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 mini

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-4.1 mini is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4.1 mini is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4.1 mini costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) costs the same as GPT-4.1 mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 4.5 is more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 mini accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4.1 mini is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

GPT-4.1 mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4.1 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while GPT-4.1 mini was released on 2025-04-14.

ERNIE 4.5 is 2 months newer than GPT-4.1 mini.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer
GPT-4.1 mini

Apr 14, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1 mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

—

GPT-4.1 mini

May 2024

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. GPT-4.1 mini is available from OpenAI.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

GPT-4.1 mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Higher GPQA score (74.0% vs 65.0%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MMLU score (87.5% vs 41.9%)
BaiduERNIE 4.5
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 mini

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and GPT-4.1 mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. GPT-4.1 mini scores CharXiv-D: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, IFEval: 84.1%, MMMLU: 78.5%, MathVista: 73.1%.
Both models cost $0.40 per million input tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and GPT-4.1 mini supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and GPT-4.1 mini is developed by OpenAI.