Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 4 benchmarks (DROP, GSM8k, HumanEval+, MMLU).

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

14.0B diff

ERNIE 4.5 has 14.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 200.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

ERNIE 4.5 is 2 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

10 months ago

1mo newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher DROP score (46.2% vs 28.6%)
Higher GSM8k score (70.1% vs 25.2%)
Higher HumanEval+ score (78.3% vs 25.0%)
Higher MMLU score (60.4% vs 41.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.
ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.