Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

232.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has 232.0B more parameters than ERNIE 4.5, making it 1104.8% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
253.0Bparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
253.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07.

ERNIE 4.5 is 3 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
NVIDIA
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (76.0% vs 74.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%.
ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA.