ERNIE 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) Comparison

Comparing ERNIE 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 4.5 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.0B diff

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has 11.0B more parameters than ERNIE 4.5, making it 52.4% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 6 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

8 months ago

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

2 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (75.0% vs 74.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (78.3% vs 16.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)