The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Comparing EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

LG AI Research · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you are already invested in the LG AI Research ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
LG AI Research
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576
Released
Apr 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 4 months newer than EXAONE 4.5 33B.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

4 months ago

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Gemini 3.7 Flash has a cutoff of 2026-03-31.

Gemini 3.7 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to EXAONE 4.5 33B (2024-12-01).

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

1.3 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

EXAONE 4.5 33B (LG AI Research) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to Gemini 3.7 Flash in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%.

What are the context window sizes for EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash?

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons