The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Seed 2.0 Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

LG AI Research · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

EXAONE 4.5 33B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2026), while Seed 2.0 Lite is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6). Seed 2.0 Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
LG AI Research
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Apr 2026
Feb 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

EXAONE 4.5 33B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2026), while Seed 2.0 Lite is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6).

Seed 2.0 Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both EXAONE 4.5 33B and Seed 2.0 Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

EXAONE 4.5 33B is 2 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

4 months ago

1mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Seed 2.0 Lite has a cutoff of 2024-01-01.

EXAONE 4.5 33B has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Seed 2.0 Lite (2024-01-01).

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

11 mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Seed 2.0 Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research and Seed 2.0 Lite is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and Seed 2.0 Lite?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons