The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] vs Qwen Image 3.0

Comparing FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Black Forest Labs · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

  • you are already invested in the Black Forest Labs ecosystem

Choose Qwen Image 3.0

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]
Black Forest Labs
Qwen Image 3.0
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
2,000
—
Released
—
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

License

Usage and distribution terms

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen Image 3.0 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen Image 3.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen Image 3.0 was released on 2026-08-04, while FLUX.1 Fill [pro]'s release date is not specified.

We can confirm Qwen Image 3.0's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without FLUX.1 Fill [pro]'s release date.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

—

Qwen Image 3.0

Aug 4, 2026

3 weeks ago

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]
✓ Preferred
Qwen Image 3.0
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about FLUX.1 Fill [pro] vs Qwen Image 3.0.

Which is better, FLUX.1 Fill [pro] or Qwen Image 3.0?

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] (Black Forest Labs) and Qwen Image 3.0 (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

What are the context window sizes for FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0?

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] supports 2K tokens and Qwen Image 3.0 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Qwen Image 3.0?

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is developed by Black Forest Labs and Qwen Image 3.0 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons