The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH), while Gemini 1.0 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 1.0 Pro is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude 3.5 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.80 / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
200,000
32,760
Released
Oct 2024
Feb 2024
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH), while Gemini 1.0 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 8 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.8 years ago

8mo newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.0 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 1.0 Pro in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 33K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google.

Related comparisons