Model Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 HaikuWhich is better in 2026?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku — which is better?

Gemini 1.0 Pro (by Google) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH). Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 1.0 Pro is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude 3.5 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 8 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.3 years ago

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (41.6% vs 27.9%)
Higher MATH score (69.4% vs 32.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Claude 3.5 Haiku in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Key differences include context window (33K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.

Related comparisons