Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 8 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.2 years ago

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (41.6% vs 27.9%)
Higher MATH score (69.4% vs 32.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock.
Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (33K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.