Model Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 5.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.0 Pro is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 11 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.3 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

DeepSeek
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (62.1% vs 27.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Key differences include context window (33K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.12/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek.