Model Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is better at 1 benchmark (MathVista).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is 10 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.2 years ago

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.4 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (32,760 tokens)
Higher MMMU score (47.9% vs 40.7%)
DeepSeek
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher MathVista score (53.6% vs 46.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%.
Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek.