The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct are closely matched at -0.6 and 0.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.6 and 0.7.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.6
#319
0.7
#312
Reasoning
-0.3
#308
0.4
#304
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Math
2.7#284
7.4#257
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

62.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has 62.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 775.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 7 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has more recent training data (up to 2024-10-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (2023-12-01).

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

10 mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.6 and 0.7. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.6 vs 0.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons