Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GSM8k, MMLU), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 12 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (85.5% vs 55.7%)
Higher GSM8k score (86.2% vs 70.1%)
Higher MMLU score (78.9% vs 60.4%)
IBM
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (82.4% vs 74.3%)
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash
IBMIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%, MGSM: 82.6%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.
Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.