Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, MathVista, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMMU).

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) costs the same as Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Llama 4 Maverick is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input tokens$0.17
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Maverick is 11 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Llama 4 Maverick

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Llama 4 Maverick

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Higher MATH score (77.9% vs 61.2%)
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (69.8% vs 51.0%)
Higher MathVista score (73.7% vs 65.8%)
Higher MGSM score (92.3% vs 82.6%)
Higher MMLU score (85.5% vs 78.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.5% vs 67.3%)
Higher MMMU score (73.4% vs 62.3%)
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash
MetaLlama 4 Maverick

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Llama 4 Maverick in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%, MGSM: 82.6%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.17/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.