Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 3.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 2.1x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's 32,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 9 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemini 1.5 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2023-11-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

1 mo newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Mistral AI.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (51.0% vs 45.3%)
Higher MATH score (77.9% vs 70.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (67.3% vs 66.3%)
Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (84.8% vs 74.3%)
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash
Mistral AIMistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%, MGSM: 82.6%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 2.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.
Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.