Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Gemini 1.5 Flash is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval).

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerGoogle

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerTogether

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 5 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 1.5 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Less expensive input tokens

Higher GPQA score (51.0% vs 36.4%)

Higher MATH score (77.9% vs 75.5%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (67.3% vs 56.3%)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher GSM8k score (91.6% vs 86.2%)

Higher HumanEval score (84.8% vs 74.3%)

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 1.5 Flash	Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%, MGSM: 82.6%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.