Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3 32B

Comparing Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more expensive than Qwen3 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 32B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Qwen3 32B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 32B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 32B is 12 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Qwen3 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 32B's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Qwen3 32B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3 32B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 1.5 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3 32B

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 1.5 Flash	Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash (Google) and Qwen3 32B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%, MGSM: 82.6%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Qwen3 32B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.