Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 29.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Input tokens$2.50

Output tokens$10.00

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2,097,152 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Input2,097,152 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.

Gemini 1.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 30B A3B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 12 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

May 1, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Pro's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Nov 2023

Qwen3 30B A3B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Pro is available from Google. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 1.5 Pro

View details

Google

Larger context window (2,097,152 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 59.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 1.5 Pro	Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Pro compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Pro scores XSTest: 98.8%, HellaSwag: 93.3%, GSM8k: 90.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 89.2%, MGSM: 87.5%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Pro cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Pro costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports 2.1M tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include context window (2.1M vs 128K), input pricing ($2.50 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.