Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 5 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

2 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher GPQA score (74.2% vs 23.7%)
Google
Larger context window (32,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.