The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024). Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
—
128,000
Released
Jan 2025
Apr 2025
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024).

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 3 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.6 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a cutoff of 2024-04-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (2024-04-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

4 mo newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons