The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 0.4.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 0.4, ranking #235 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.7 and ranks #235 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
16.7
#235
0.4
#340
Reasoning
17.0
#228
0.1
#333
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 4 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.7 years ago

3mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (2023-12-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

8 mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 0.4. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.7 vs 0.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons