The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Phi 4

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Phi 4

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Phi 4
Microsoft
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
—
16,000
Released
Jan 2025
Dec 2024
License
Proprietary
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,000 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,000 tokens
Output16,000 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 1 month newer than Phi 4.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.6 years ago

1mo newer
Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Phi 4 has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

2 mo newer
Phi 4

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Phi 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Phi 4.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Phi 4?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Phi 4?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Phi 4?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Phi 4?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons