Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct — which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (by Google) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 0 month newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.5 years ago

5d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher MMMU score (75.4% vs 70.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons