The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 142.9x cheaper per token.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 142.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 142.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$0.10 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
32,000
Released
Jun 2025
Jun 2025
License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens) is 200.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 0 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 200.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $20.00/M), licensing (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons