Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4.1 mini

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 4.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4.1 mini is better at 2 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, GPQA).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4.1 mini is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4.1 mini's 1,047,576 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4.1 mini is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.1 mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, while GPT-4.1 mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

GPT-4.1 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17, while GPT-4.1 mini was released on 2025-04-14.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 2 months newer than GPT-4.1 mini.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

11 months ago

2mo newer
GPT-4.1 mini

Apr 14, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while GPT-4.1 mini has a cutoff of 2024-05-31.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4.1 mini (2024-05-31).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

8 mo newer
GPT-4.1 mini

May 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. GPT-4.1 mini is available from OpenAI.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

GPT-4.1 mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (49.8% vs 40.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (5.1% vs 3.7%)
Higher MMMU score (72.9% vs 72.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (31.6% vs 23.6%)
OpenAI
Higher Aider-Polyglot score (34.7% vs 26.7%)
Higher GPQA score (65.0% vs 64.6%)
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4.1 mini.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and GPT-4.1 mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite compare to GPT-4.1 mini in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%. GPT-4.1 mini scores CharXiv-D: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, IFEval: 84.1%, MMMLU: 78.5%, MathVista: 73.1%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40/M input and $1.60/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4.1 mini supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.1 mini?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.40/M), licensing (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and GPT-4.1 mini is developed by OpenAI.