Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.2 Codex Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.2 Codex across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.2 Codex don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens) is 17.5x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Codex ($1.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens) is 35.0x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Codex ($14.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 Codex is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Codex
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-5.2 Codex's 400,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 Codex can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Codex
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.2 Codex support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.2 Codex

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, while GPT-5.2 Codex uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

GPT-5.2 Codex

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17, while GPT-5.2 Codex was released on 2026-01-14.

GPT-5.2 Codex is 7 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

9 months ago

GPT-5.2 Codex

Jan 14, 2026

2 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while GPT-5.2 Codex's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.2 Codex's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

GPT-5.2 Codex

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. GPT-5.2 Codex is available from OpenAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

GPT-5.2 Codex

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Codex