Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is 29.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v5), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 66.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 16.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.5 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.0% vs 11.6%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (88.4% vs 64.5%)
Higher GPQA score (82.8% vs 23.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v5 score (63.9% vs 25.7%)
Google
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
GoogleGemma 3n E4B Instructed
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.