Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 5.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 128,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

10 months ago

2mo newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mar 17, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is available from Mistral AI.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (82.8% vs 37.5%)
Higher MMMU score (79.7% vs 59.3%)
Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral AIMistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base scores MMLU: 81.0%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MMMU: 59.3%, MMLU-Pro: 56.0%, GPQA: 37.5%.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via mistral.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.