Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Flash (by Google) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam). Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 2.5 Flash is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 4.2x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 14 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Meta
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 11.0%)
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
MetaMuse Spark 1.1
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.30 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons