Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 10.4x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$2.50

Best providerGoogle

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Input tokens$0.06

Output tokens$0.24

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 7 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

10 months ago

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

3 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a cutoff of 2025-11-28.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has more recent training data (up to 2025-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash (2025-01-31).

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

10 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.