Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7BWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B — which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Flash (by Google) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (82.8% vs 30.8%)
Higher MMMU score (79.7% vs 59.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5-Omni-7B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons