Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base is 4 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 2.5 Flash	Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base?

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base?

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.