Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemini Diffusion

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini Diffusion is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini Diffusion
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies output context (65,535 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Google
Gemini Diffusion
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini Diffusion does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini Diffusion

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini Diffusion

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Gemini Diffusion was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is 1 month newer than Gemini Diffusion.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

10 months ago

2w newer
Gemini Diffusion

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemini Diffusion's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini Diffusion's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Gemini Diffusion

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (88.0% vs 23.3%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (89.2% vs 69.1%)
Higher GPQA score (86.4% vs 40.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (69.0% vs 30.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (67.2% vs 22.9%)
Google

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Google
Gemini Diffusion

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemini Diffusion

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and Gemini Diffusion is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. Gemini Diffusion scores HumanEval: 89.6%, MBPP: 76.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 69.1%, LBPP (v2): 56.8%, BigCodeBench: 45.4%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini Diffusion supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.