Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) Comparison

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 20.8x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 41.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 6 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

9 months ago

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

3 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a cutoff of 2025-11-28.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has more recent training data (up to 2025-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2025-01-31).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

10 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (86.4% vs 75.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (21.6% vs 15.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (67.2% vs 38.8%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.2% vs 88.0%)

Detailed Comparison