Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v5), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.0% vs 6.7%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (88.6% vs 59.0%)
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 24.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v5 score (75.6% vs 18.6%)
Google
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
GoogleGemma 3n E2B Instructed
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.