Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hermes 3 70B

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Hermes 3 70B is 5.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Hermes 3 70B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($1.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$1.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input131,072 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hermes 3 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Hermes 3 70B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 9 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

9mo newer
Hermes 3 70B

Aug 15, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Hermes 3 70B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Hermes 3 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 66.1%)
Nous Research
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Nous ResearchHermes 3 70B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hermes 3 70B

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google and Hermes 3 70B is made by Nous Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. Hermes 3 70B scores MT-Bench: 89.9%, HellaSwag: 88.2%, BoolQ: 88.0%, PIQA: 84.4%, Winogrande: 83.2%.
Hermes 3 70B is 3.6x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Hermes 3 70B costs $0.35/M input and $1.40/M output via deepinfra.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Hermes 3 70B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.35/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google and Hermes 3 70B is developed by Nous Research.