Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 8 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

7mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (2023-12-01).

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

1.1 yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
NVIDIA
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
NVIDIALlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (NVIDIA) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.