Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's 262,144 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 9 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

9 months ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

2 weeks ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (86.6% vs 83.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (47.5% vs 17.8%)
Higher MMMU score (83.9% vs 79.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (72.0% vs 63.2%)
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-122B-A10B

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B